Greetings. It appears you have not registered with the keeper of records. Visit here to submit thy name to our registrar. Once completed, you will enjoy all the features these hallowed halls provide. Please be sure and introduce yourself to others you find here after having done so. The more you participate, the more access you may be granted.
Loremaster - How Wizards of the Coast Could Slay in Profit

    • How Wizards of the Coast Could Slay in Profit

      by
      Matt James
      Published on 03-06-2012 08:16 PM  Number of Views: 1978  
      2 Comments Comments
      I'll start out and say that this piece is purely from an armchair executive point of view. I, honestly, have no idea how to run a very large corporation, and my education and experience is placed well into another industry. But lets role-play for a moment. If I were in charge, one of the biggest things I could see supporting is the release of content from prior editions. This also includes the design and development of --new-- content utilizing DDI's medium. This means that the company can support all different editions with minimal impact to their current brand. They already own the copyright to the material, why not stir up some extra bucks.

      http://slowlygoingbald.com/images/co...hevy_chase.png

      Each edition has a core group that will forever remain faithful to the release of their choice. Like a gold-mining sluice box, customers will slowly roll from one edition to another, but ultimately some of the gold settles right where it wants. I know 2e players that will never move on. To them, 2e is the gold-standard of RPG tabletop gaming. Are they wrong? Hell no. It's a personal preference, and far be it from me to put some stink in their joy. The same goes for 3e and retroclones (BEMCI, OSRIC, and Pathfinder). In fact, there's a reason some of those retroclones have done so well--especially Pathfinder!

      In this armchair managing, I don't foresee this as having a burden that is too immense. The company would need to hire freelance developers to look over content, editors to help comb through the submissions, and probably one full-time employee to head it up--to form the DDI team. Articles don't need to come out every day, for every edition. Heck, even once every other week would be enough to snatch up extra DDI subscriptions that would otherwise be ignored.

      In the end, I think the benefit of supporting all editions would generate enough profit to support the cast required to produce it. As well, WotC scores a major PR hit by reaching back and tossing bones to the older fans. Who knows, maybe while my 2e buddy is reading an article from his edition, he might sneak a peak at something newer and like it?

      I'm not sure all of this would actually work in practice, but I'm willing to listen to what people think is the worse that could happen. I think DDI has potential to be a solidifying glue--one that could be great for fans from all eras. If any company could pull this off, it would be WotC. Despite some of the grognarding on the Interwebs, there are some smart people there.

      ---
      Matt James is a game designer that lives in the Washington, DC area. His works include Soldiers of Fortune, Monster Vault: Threats to the Nentir Vale, Lair Assault: Attack of the Tyrantclaw, and Into the Unknown: The Dungeon Survival Guide. When not designing content for DUNGEONS & DRAGONS®, Matt is endlessly working on developing new and fun games.
      Comments 2 Comments
      1. gaming tonic's Avatar
        gaming tonic - 03-13-2012, 03:30 PM
        You bring up an excellent point Matt. I think WotC are aware that the potential is there although I can't elaborate on what makes me believe that right now (I mentioned that I got the Silence Spell on some marketing and distribution stuff in my EN World piece about the D&D Summit). Perhaps in a play to bring back gamers who left the fold with their addition of choice they would do this and it is entirely possible that you get there interest in your new edition of the game. What you said about the costs are probably pretty accurate as it wouldn't take much in the way of staffing and the platform (DDI) is already there for distribution. I am sure the business people (yes they are in business) over at WotC will at some point realize that they can bring fans of older editions back into the fold eventually. You are correct about the grognarding and if WotC announced this tomorrow some would say that they aren't even making a next edition anymore and that Wizards is only supporting old stuff from now on. Great article, I am excited to see how different what they manage to pull off is from what they had planned.
      1. Sanishiver's Avatar
        Sanishiver - 05-22-2012, 01:07 AM
        I'd be all for this if I knew it would allow me to get my hands on PDF issues of out of print Dragon and Dungeon magazines.

        I have copies of several old issues that I go back to again and again for use during play; they're the issues that have seen use across three major editions of the D&D game and I'd love to have digital versions that I can call up on my laptop.

        To me, it would be better for Wizards of the Coast to start by simply releasing the content of older editions as part of a monthly roll-out of gaming material through DDI, starting with 3rd Edition D&D and working backwards until all the digital material is available to subscribers.

        Once they've gauged the level of interest (in terms of new or re-upped subscriptions to DDI), they can decide based on download activity and/or surveys what rules editions to focus on for new articles and content.

        All in my armchair opinion, of course.